1st Corinthians 15,42-49
So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is
raised an imperishable body; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it
is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is
raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual
body. So also it is written, "The first MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING
SOUL." The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, the spiritual
is not first, but the natural; then the spiritual. The first man is from the
earth, earthy; the second man is from heaven. As is the earthy, so also are
those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also are those who are
heavenly. Just as we have borne the image of the earthy, we will also bear the
image of the heavenly.
Commentary:
Adam
was familiar with the very presence of God; He visited Adam in the cool of the
day, so when Adam fell, he sinned knowing the very presence of God, just as
Lucifer did, which was a profound sin, suggesting that Adam may not be with us
in heaven. However, we have never seen God, so our sin is not as great as
Adam’s sin. Plus, Adam initiated the rebellion, whereas we were innocently born
into it. We live in a fallen creation based on our understanding of astronomy.
There is no life of any kind anywhere in the universe that we know, except here
on earth. All the planets are dead, probably being the case of every planet in
the universe. The stars themselves will eventually grow old and die, and so
basically it is a dying creation. It is a slow death, but it is dying just the
same. Despite these facts, there is no mention of God offering Adam and Eve the
universe, only the earth, and so there is no reason based on them that the
universe is cursed, and so God must have cursed the universe based on Lucifer’s
rebellion. Stars are still burning and so in that sense the universe is still
operating; God even cursed the earth at Satan’s rebellion. However, because it
is the future planet of God’s throne, the earth’s curse was repressed allowing
life to continue, though requiring the Garden of Eden as an oasis from the
curse. This describes the human body as well: it is cursed yet it still has the
capacity for life. Outside the garden the land was already cursed before God
made man, so when He evicted him and his wife, they were forced to make a
living among the thorns and thistles. The only way for man to reverse the curse
was within the garden; therefore, when God said to the man in Genesis 3,17-19,
“Cursed is the ground because of you,” He meant that Adam and his wife were
supposed to expand the garden throughout the earth to overtake the curse.
However, since they rejected God’s purpose for themselves, the land remained
cursed, and God made them accountable for it. This also means God made man from
dust that was cursed, and then breathed a perfect spirit into him that staved
off the curse from Adam’s body. It actually stands to reason that Adam’s body
was made from a cursed material, since God said to the woman that her pain in
childbirth would be greatly multiplied, meaning that it would have been painful
even if they had not sinned, only to a lesser degree, pain being an aspect of
the curse (Rev 21-4). This also is the exact scenario of Christ: He had a
perfect spirit but lived in a fallible body, being the reason Paul dubbed Him
the second Adam. We know from the above verse that there will be no sorrow or
pain in heaven. This suggests a couple things; first, what God offered Adam and
Eve does not hold a candle to what He offers us now that Christ has shed His
blood to offer us a new and better way into the Most Holy Place. Also, although
they lived in fallible bodies, Adam and Eve would have never died had they not
sinned, because their perfect spirits counteracted the curse. The same goes for
Christ. In fact, His death was a miracle, since He was without sin. Death
follows sin, but there was no clause mentioned in the law of sin that allowed
for a death without sin; thus, Jesus broke the law of sin through His death
(Rom 8-1,2). This means His death gained the victory over the curse and not His
resurrection; His resurrection was a mere reification of His endless life, like
a bobber that returns to the surface after the fish quits tugging on it.
1 Corinthians chapter 13 - the love chapter
Tuesday, July 5, 2016
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Abortion
Ex 21,22-25 – If men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she gives birth prematurely, yet there is no injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman's husband may demand of him, and he shall pay as the judges decide. "But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
Abortion, this is pretty clear-cut. The old NASB (uses the word miscarriage) and the King James Version of the Bible uses the phrase “fruit departs from her,” which speak as if the fetus dies. Hebrew OT translates this verse using the words “yatsa' (yaw-tsaw')” meaning to depart, to go, bring out. Most other translations speak about the woman giving birth prematurely, which back in those days was extremely unlikely that the baby was born alive. Do a study on “Innocent blood” Scriptures of the Old Testament. Of course, no one is more innocent than the pre-born baby! Notice, that the man who struck the woman did not have to die as a result of the injury to the woman’s fetus. This passage clearly states that it was an accident, while we know abortion is by no means an accident. Therefore on the one hand, in this case the man who caused the miscarriage will not forfeit his life, because it was an accident. In contrast, it says about the mother, if any further injury occurs to her, you are to prosecute, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, life for life. This suggests that the fetus doesn’t have the same rights as a person in the eyes of God. On the other hand, people cross a forbidden line when they intentionally destroy a healthy living fetus. When we combine the limited rights of the fetus with intentional abortion, we can see why God views it as murder, giving us good reason to interpret the word-study on “Innocent Blood” as the sin of abortion. What can we say about pro-life advocates? They are doing well to advocate for the unborn, particularly when their rivals in the pro-choice camp are sacrificing these potential babies by the millions to the god of convenience and to their hedonistic lifestyles. Pro-lifers attribute full rights to the unborn fetus, which the Bible does not corroborate, while pro-choicers give them no rights at all, so the truth is in the middle again where we usually find it.
From: www.jeansbiblestudy.com
Abortion, this is pretty clear-cut. The old NASB (uses the word miscarriage) and the King James Version of the Bible uses the phrase “fruit departs from her,” which speak as if the fetus dies. Hebrew OT translates this verse using the words “yatsa' (yaw-tsaw')” meaning to depart, to go, bring out. Most other translations speak about the woman giving birth prematurely, which back in those days was extremely unlikely that the baby was born alive. Do a study on “Innocent blood” Scriptures of the Old Testament. Of course, no one is more innocent than the pre-born baby! Notice, that the man who struck the woman did not have to die as a result of the injury to the woman’s fetus. This passage clearly states that it was an accident, while we know abortion is by no means an accident. Therefore on the one hand, in this case the man who caused the miscarriage will not forfeit his life, because it was an accident. In contrast, it says about the mother, if any further injury occurs to her, you are to prosecute, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, life for life. This suggests that the fetus doesn’t have the same rights as a person in the eyes of God. On the other hand, people cross a forbidden line when they intentionally destroy a healthy living fetus. When we combine the limited rights of the fetus with intentional abortion, we can see why God views it as murder, giving us good reason to interpret the word-study on “Innocent Blood” as the sin of abortion. What can we say about pro-life advocates? They are doing well to advocate for the unborn, particularly when their rivals in the pro-choice camp are sacrificing these potential babies by the millions to the god of convenience and to their hedonistic lifestyles. Pro-lifers attribute full rights to the unborn fetus, which the Bible does not corroborate, while pro-choicers give them no rights at all, so the truth is in the middle again where we usually find it.
From: www.jeansbiblestudy.com
Saturday, June 8, 2013
Love is not something you can actually put into words. Paul made an attempt, saying: “love is patient, love is kind.” All he could say is that it is associated with the fruits of the spirit, described in Galatians chapter 5, indicating that all the other fruits are embedded in one, love. So it appears that we cannot experience “Joy” without love, or any of the fruits of the spirit. Being that love seems so difficult to define, it gives rise to the possibility that love is a manifestation of the Holy Spirit, suggesting that those who live and walk in love have entered a spiritual state of being. We often receive huge responses from the smallest acts of love, why? We are being like God during those moments, demonstrating the kingdom of heaven. We have been taught all our lives that love is an action. It ultimately is manifested as an action, but love itself is not an action, but a spiritual substance that originates from heaven, being one of the few things the world is willing to receive from us. The best definition of love is that it is the substance of the anointing. This explains why love is indescribable, because no one is able to describe the anointing. God has given us various levers of the anointing in the gifts of the spirit, but without the fruits of the Spirit, primarily love, these levers don’t work.
Taken from: www.jeansbiblestudy.com
Taken from: www.jeansbiblestudy.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)